Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
