Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
The text states that the three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application against a personal guarantor is directory, not mandatory, because Section 121(2) uses mandatory language without prescribing any consequence for delay. It further states that delay may be condoned on sufficient cause under the Limitation Act read with Section 238A of the Code, and that a dismissal solely on limitation without reasons is unsustainable. The application was therefore restored for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
