Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Belated homebuyer claims reflected in the corporate debtor's records were not defeated by delay where the Resolution Professional showed no notice to the claimants, their registered agreement to sell and allotment details were available in the virtual data room, and the CIRP overlapped substantially with the Covid period; the claim was ordered to be admitted by addendum to the resolution plan. The Tribunal further held that purchasers with a registered agreement and recorded payment history were genuine homebuyers, not speculative investors, and therefore belonged in Category A of the plan. As the rival claimant sought refund with interest on assured-return reservation letters, the appellants were treated as having the superior claim and the impugned order was set aside.
Belated homebuyer claims reflected in the corporate debtor's records were not defeated by delay where the Resolution Professional showed no notice to the claimants, their registered agreement to sell and allotment details were available in the virtual data room, and the CIRP overlapped substantially with the Covid period; the claim was ordered to be admitted by addendum to the resolution plan. The Tribunal further held that purchasers with a registered agreement and recorded payment history were genuine homebuyers, not speculative investors, and therefore belonged in Category A of the plan. As the rival claimant sought refund with interest on assured-return reservation letters, the appellants were treated as having the superior claim and the impugned order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
