Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Belated homebuyer claims reflected in the corporate debtor's records were not defeated by delay where the Resolution Professional showed no notice to the claimants, their registered agreement to sell and allotment details were available in the virtual data room, and the CIRP overlapped substantially with the Covid period; the claim was ordered to be admitted by addendum to the resolution plan. The Tribunal further held that purchasers with a registered agreement and recorded payment history were genuine homebuyers, not speculative investors, and therefore belonged in Category A of the plan. As the rival claimant sought refund with interest on assured-return reservation letters, the appellants were treated as having the superior claim and the impugned order was set aside.
Belated homebuyer claims reflected in the corporate debtor's records were not defeated by delay where the Resolution Professional showed no notice to the claimants, their registered agreement to sell and allotment details were available in the virtual data room, and the CIRP overlapped substantially with the Covid period; the claim was ordered to be admitted by addendum to the resolution plan. The Tribunal further held that purchasers with a registered agreement and recorded payment history were genuine homebuyers, not speculative investors, and therefore belonged in Category A of the plan. As the rival claimant sought refund with interest on assured-return reservation letters, the appellants were treated as having the superior claim and the impugned order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.