Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Services performed and consumed outside India were held not taxable in India under reverse charge, because the overseas inspection and processing activities related to exported goods and fell outside the import-of-service rule. The Tribunal also found the classification in the impugned order unsustainable, since the same services were not given a clear and consistent sub-clause under Business Auxiliary Service. Best judgment computation based on doubled historical figures was rejected as arbitrary where there was no evidence of later payments. The extended period of limitation was also denied, as prior audits and filed returns undermined any allegation of suppression or intent to evade.
Services performed and consumed outside India were held not taxable in India under reverse charge, because the overseas inspection and processing activities related to exported goods and fell outside the import-of-service rule. The Tribunal also found the classification in the impugned order unsustainable, since the same services were not given a clear and consistent sub-clause under Business Auxiliary Service. Best judgment computation based on doubled historical figures was rejected as arbitrary where there was no evidence of later payments. The extended period of limitation was also denied, as prior audits and filed returns undermined any allegation of suppression or intent to evade.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
