Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Purchase and resale of cargo space by a freight forwarder on its own account was held to be a principal-to-principal trading transaction, not an intermediary or composite taxable service. The Tribunal found that mere markup between buying and selling prices did not prove rendition of Business Support Service or any other service, and the alleged local transportation, cargo handling, labour and facilitation services were unsupported by evidence. It also noted that the appellant bore the risk of unsold space and acted as principal, consistent with the departmental clarification that such activity is not intermediary service. The surplus from resale was treated as business income from trading in space, so the service tax, interest and penalties were set aside.
Purchase and resale of cargo space by a freight forwarder on its own account was held to be a principal-to-principal trading transaction, not an intermediary or composite taxable service. The Tribunal found that mere markup between buying and selling prices did not prove rendition of Business Support Service or any other service, and the alleged local transportation, cargo handling, labour and facilitation services were unsupported by evidence. It also noted that the appellant bore the risk of unsold space and acted as principal, consistent with the departmental clarification that such activity is not intermediary service. The surplus from resale was treated as business income from trading in space, so the service tax, interest and penalties were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.