Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
