Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.