Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Section 75(4) of the GST law requires a personal hearing where a written request is made or an adverse decision is contemplated. Denial of that hearing, despite an admitted request and a proposed adverse order, vitiates the adjudication as contrary to both the statute and natural justice. The impugned GST order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting hearing before an officer other than the one who issued the show-cause notice.
Section 75(4) of the GST law requires a personal hearing where a written request is made or an adverse decision is contemplated. Denial of that hearing, despite an admitted request and a proposed adverse order, vitiates the adjudication as contrary to both the statute and natural justice. The impugned GST order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting hearing before an officer other than the one who issued the show-cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.