Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Section 75(4) of the GST law requires a personal hearing where a written request is made or an adverse decision is contemplated. Denial of that hearing, despite an admitted request and a proposed adverse order, vitiates the adjudication as contrary to both the statute and natural justice. The impugned GST order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting hearing before an officer other than the one who issued the show-cause notice.
Section 75(4) of the GST law requires a personal hearing where a written request is made or an adverse decision is contemplated. Denial of that hearing, despite an admitted request and a proposed adverse order, vitiates the adjudication as contrary to both the statute and natural justice. The impugned GST order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting hearing before an officer other than the one who issued the show-cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.