Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.