Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
