Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.