Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Reassessment against a converted non-existing firm was jurisdictionally defective where no notice under section 148 was issued to the successor company and the proceedings were continued in the erstwhile firm's name. The HC also held that mandatory faceless assessment procedure was breached because no draft assessment order was issued under section 144B and a final order was passed directly. The reassessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after curing these defects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
