Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
For import of finished goods by a routine distributor, RPM was treated as the most appropriate transfer pricing method because the assessee merely resold the imported products without processing, physical alteration, or value addition, and no local intangibles were shown. Advertising, sales and distribution expenditure below the gross profit line did not affect RPM analysis, so rejection of RPM in favour of TNMM was unwarranted. Interest under the relevant provisions was left to follow the assessment outcome, while the challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was held premature.
For import of finished goods by a routine distributor, RPM was treated as the most appropriate transfer pricing method because the assessee merely resold the imported products without processing, physical alteration, or value addition, and no local intangibles were shown. Advertising, sales and distribution expenditure below the gross profit line did not affect RPM analysis, so rejection of RPM in favour of TNMM was unwarranted. Interest under the relevant provisions was left to follow the assessment outcome, while the challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was held premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
