Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For import of finished goods by a routine distributor, RPM was treated as the most appropriate transfer pricing method because the assessee merely resold the imported products without processing, physical alteration, or value addition, and no local intangibles were shown. Advertising, sales and distribution expenditure below the gross profit line did not affect RPM analysis, so rejection of RPM in favour of TNMM was unwarranted. Interest under the relevant provisions was left to follow the assessment outcome, while the challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was held premature.
For import of finished goods by a routine distributor, RPM was treated as the most appropriate transfer pricing method because the assessee merely resold the imported products without processing, physical alteration, or value addition, and no local intangibles were shown. Advertising, sales and distribution expenditure below the gross profit line did not affect RPM analysis, so rejection of RPM in favour of TNMM was unwarranted. Interest under the relevant provisions was left to follow the assessment outcome, while the challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings was held premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
