Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Payment to a tenant for taking over a building on lease cancellation was supported by the agreement, bank records, ledger entries and TDS documents, so ITAT accepted it as part of the building block of assets. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not recast the brought-forward written-down value by relying on assumptions from earlier years, especially when the block had been consistently carried forward in the books and returns and no contrary material was produced. It also noted that the earlier revaluation related to land, not the factory building. The restriction of the short-term capital loss was therefore unsustainable, and the loss claimed was allowed.
Payment to a tenant for taking over a building on lease cancellation was supported by the agreement, bank records, ledger entries and TDS documents, so ITAT accepted it as part of the building block of assets. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not recast the brought-forward written-down value by relying on assumptions from earlier years, especially when the block had been consistently carried forward in the books and returns and no contrary material was produced. It also noted that the earlier revaluation related to land, not the factory building. The restriction of the short-term capital loss was therefore unsustainable, and the loss claimed was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
