Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Capital gains under sections 45 and 48 are to be computed asset-wise, so each transfer of a long-term capital asset is a distinct source of gain. On that basis, section 54 exemption must be examined with reference to each transferred residential house and not by aggregating gains from multiple sales into one composite figure for investment in only one new house. The proviso allowing investment in two residential houses, where the capital gain does not exceed the prescribed limit, also operates transfer-wise. As the assessee sold multiple flats and invested in several residential houses, the statutory condition was not breached and the full section 54 claim was allowed; the earlier consistent treatment of the same claim supported this result.
Capital gains under sections 45 and 48 are to be computed asset-wise, so each transfer of a long-term capital asset is a distinct source of gain. On that basis, section 54 exemption must be examined with reference to each transferred residential house and not by aggregating gains from multiple sales into one composite figure for investment in only one new house. The proviso allowing investment in two residential houses, where the capital gain does not exceed the prescribed limit, also operates transfer-wise. As the assessee sold multiple flats and invested in several residential houses, the statutory condition was not breached and the full section 54 claim was allowed; the earlier consistent treatment of the same claim supported this result.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.