Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insurance premium written back under extraordinary items required verification of whether the original disallowance of the larger amount had survived in appeal, and the balance addition was remitted for consequential recomputation after checking that status. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was treated as a loss that crystallised only in the subsequent year when payment was made at a higher exchange rate, so it was regarded as an unascertained liability on the balance-sheet date and the disallowance, including the book profit add-back, was sustained. Prior period expenditure, including interest to financial institutions, was allowed in the year of payment where the liability had crystallised, and the corresponding disallowance was deleted.
Insurance premium written back under extraordinary items required verification of whether the original disallowance of the larger amount had survived in appeal, and the balance addition was remitted for consequential recomputation after checking that status. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was treated as a loss that crystallised only in the subsequent year when payment was made at a higher exchange rate, so it was regarded as an unascertained liability on the balance-sheet date and the disallowance, including the book profit add-back, was sustained. Prior period expenditure, including interest to financial institutions, was allowed in the year of payment where the liability had crystallised, and the corresponding disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.