Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
581 to 600 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insurance premium written back under extraordinary items required verification of whether the original disallowance of the larger amount had survived in appeal, and the balance addition was remitted for consequential recomputation after checking that status. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was treated as a loss that crystallised only in the subsequent year when payment was made at a higher exchange rate, so it was regarded as an unascertained liability on the balance-sheet date and the disallowance, including the book profit add-back, was sustained. Prior period expenditure, including interest to financial institutions, was allowed in the year of payment where the liability had crystallised, and the corresponding disallowance was deleted.
Insurance premium written back under extraordinary items required verification of whether the original disallowance of the larger amount had survived in appeal, and the balance addition was remitted for consequential recomputation after checking that status. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was treated as a loss that crystallised only in the subsequent year when payment was made at a higher exchange rate, so it was regarded as an unascertained liability on the balance-sheet date and the disallowance, including the book profit add-back, was sustained. Prior period expenditure, including interest to financial institutions, was allowed in the year of payment where the liability had crystallised, and the corresponding disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.