Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the Indo-Thai Free Trade Agreement, Indian customs authorities could not disregard Certificates of Origin once the Thai authorities had confirmed their authenticity and issuance by the Department of Foreign Trade, Thailand. The decision treats that foreign certification as conclusive for concessional duty purposes and bars an independent Indian enquiry that would undermine the Interim Rules of Origin. A statement recorded from the importer under the Customs Act could not affect the authenticity of the certificates. The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge failed because no substantial question of law arose.
Under the Indo-Thai Free Trade Agreement, Indian customs authorities could not disregard Certificates of Origin once the Thai authorities had confirmed their authenticity and issuance by the Department of Foreign Trade, Thailand. The decision treats that foreign certification as conclusive for concessional duty purposes and bars an independent Indian enquiry that would undermine the Interim Rules of Origin. A statement recorded from the importer under the Customs Act could not affect the authenticity of the certificates. The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge failed because no substantial question of law arose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.