Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Notification No. 12/2012-Cus was treated as prospective because its saving clause preserved things done or omitted under the earlier notification, showing no intention of retrospective operation. Customs duty could not be imposed later on vessels already imported into India in 2009 merely because they were subsequently sought to be converted from foreign-going vessel status to coastal run. The HC followed the prior view on the same issue and held that the demand for duty was illegal; the writ petition was allowed and the bank guarantees furnished under interim orders were directed to be discontinued.
Notification No. 12/2012-Cus was treated as prospective because its saving clause preserved things done or omitted under the earlier notification, showing no intention of retrospective operation. Customs duty could not be imposed later on vessels already imported into India in 2009 merely because they were subsequently sought to be converted from foreign-going vessel status to coastal run. The HC followed the prior view on the same issue and held that the demand for duty was illegal; the writ petition was allowed and the bank guarantees furnished under interim orders were directed to be discontinued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
