Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Notification No. 12/2012-Cus was treated as prospective because its saving clause preserved things done or omitted under the earlier notification, showing no intention of retrospective operation. Customs duty could not be imposed later on vessels already imported into India in 2009 merely because they were subsequently sought to be converted from foreign-going vessel status to coastal run. The HC followed the prior view on the same issue and held that the demand for duty was illegal; the writ petition was allowed and the bank guarantees furnished under interim orders were directed to be discontinued.
Notification No. 12/2012-Cus was treated as prospective because its saving clause preserved things done or omitted under the earlier notification, showing no intention of retrospective operation. Customs duty could not be imposed later on vessels already imported into India in 2009 merely because they were subsequently sought to be converted from foreign-going vessel status to coastal run. The HC followed the prior view on the same issue and held that the demand for duty was illegal; the writ petition was allowed and the bank guarantees furnished under interim orders were directed to be discontinued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.