Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Remuneration payable to an IRP forms part of CIRP costs and is not excluded from judicial scrutiny merely because the CoC acts within commercial wisdom; fee fixation still requires examination of the factual basis, work performed and governing arrangement. However, on a reading of the first CoC meeting agenda, minutes and resolutions, the approved IRP remuneration was a consolidated amount, while monthly remuneration was linked to appointment as RP, which was rejected. The IRP had no vested right to continue, the replacement delay did not convert the fee into a monthly entitlement, and the later minimum-fee prescription was inapplicable. The fixed remuneration and expenses were upheld, and the claim for monthly remuneration for the entire tenure failed.
Remuneration payable to an IRP forms part of CIRP costs and is not excluded from judicial scrutiny merely because the CoC acts within commercial wisdom; fee fixation still requires examination of the factual basis, work performed and governing arrangement. However, on a reading of the first CoC meeting agenda, minutes and resolutions, the approved IRP remuneration was a consolidated amount, while monthly remuneration was linked to appointment as RP, which was rejected. The IRP had no vested right to continue, the replacement delay did not convert the fee into a monthly entitlement, and the later minimum-fee prescription was inapplicable. The fixed remuneration and expenses were upheld, and the claim for monthly remuneration for the entire tenure failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.