Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Remuneration payable to an IRP forms part of CIRP costs and is not excluded from judicial scrutiny merely because the CoC acts within commercial wisdom; fee fixation still requires examination of the factual basis, work performed and governing arrangement. However, on a reading of the first CoC meeting agenda, minutes and resolutions, the approved IRP remuneration was a consolidated amount, while monthly remuneration was linked to appointment as RP, which was rejected. The IRP had no vested right to continue, the replacement delay did not convert the fee into a monthly entitlement, and the later minimum-fee prescription was inapplicable. The fixed remuneration and expenses were upheld, and the claim for monthly remuneration for the entire tenure failed.
Remuneration payable to an IRP forms part of CIRP costs and is not excluded from judicial scrutiny merely because the CoC acts within commercial wisdom; fee fixation still requires examination of the factual basis, work performed and governing arrangement. However, on a reading of the first CoC meeting agenda, minutes and resolutions, the approved IRP remuneration was a consolidated amount, while monthly remuneration was linked to appointment as RP, which was rejected. The IRP had no vested right to continue, the replacement delay did not convert the fee into a monthly entitlement, and the later minimum-fee prescription was inapplicable. The fixed remuneration and expenses were upheld, and the claim for monthly remuneration for the entire tenure failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.