Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 82 of the CGST Act was held to be expressly subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so GST dues did not acquire secured creditor status in CIRP and were to be dealt with under the insolvency waterfall as unsecured operational debt. Rainbow Papers was distinguished because it concerned a different VAT provision without the IBC saving clause. The Tribunal also upheld rejection of an updated tax claim based on liability arising during moratorium, since scrutiny orders could not be passed while moratorium was in force. The appeal was dismissed.
Section 82 of the CGST Act was held to be expressly subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so GST dues did not acquire secured creditor status in CIRP and were to be dealt with under the insolvency waterfall as unsecured operational debt. Rainbow Papers was distinguished because it concerned a different VAT provision without the IBC saving clause. The Tribunal also upheld rejection of an updated tax claim based on liability arising during moratorium, since scrutiny orders could not be passed while moratorium was in force. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.