Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Continuation of CIRP after a genuine repayment offer may be stopped where the sole creditor has been fully paid and no other claims exist. The Code is aimed at revival of the corporate debtor, not compulsory divestiture or settling personal scores. On these facts, refusal by the sole-member CoC to accept settlement without any justifiable reason was treated as arbitrary and as misuse of the insolvency process. Once malicious intent or abuse became apparent during the proceedings, the Tribunal could terminate the CIRP itself rather than wait for separate penal consequences.
Continuation of CIRP after a genuine repayment offer may be stopped where the sole creditor has been fully paid and no other claims exist. The Code is aimed at revival of the corporate debtor, not compulsory divestiture or settling personal scores. On these facts, refusal by the sole-member CoC to accept settlement without any justifiable reason was treated as arbitrary and as misuse of the insolvency process. Once malicious intent or abuse became apparent during the proceedings, the Tribunal could terminate the CIRP itself rather than wait for separate penal consequences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.