Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Continuation of CIRP after a genuine repayment offer may be stopped where the sole creditor has been fully paid and no other claims exist. The Code is aimed at revival of the corporate debtor, not compulsory divestiture or settling personal scores. On these facts, refusal by the sole-member CoC to accept settlement without any justifiable reason was treated as arbitrary and as misuse of the insolvency process. Once malicious intent or abuse became apparent during the proceedings, the Tribunal could terminate the CIRP itself rather than wait for separate penal consequences.
Continuation of CIRP after a genuine repayment offer may be stopped where the sole creditor has been fully paid and no other claims exist. The Code is aimed at revival of the corporate debtor, not compulsory divestiture or settling personal scores. On these facts, refusal by the sole-member CoC to accept settlement without any justifiable reason was treated as arbitrary and as misuse of the insolvency process. Once malicious intent or abuse became apparent during the proceedings, the Tribunal could terminate the CIRP itself rather than wait for separate penal consequences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.