Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Pre-existing dispute over operational debt prevents Section 9 insolvency admission where contemporaneous correspondence and draft settlement material show a plausible, non-spurious contractual dispute. The Tribunal applied the Mobilox test and held that the Adjudicating Authority must only ask whether the defence raises a contention needing further investigation; it cannot decide merits or require prior civil, arbitral or debit-note proceedings as a condition for dispute. Disputed credits, work-completion certificates and settlement documents were treated as matters for fuller adjudication, and the order admitting CIRP was set aside.
Pre-existing dispute over operational debt prevents Section 9 insolvency admission where contemporaneous correspondence and draft settlement material show a plausible, non-spurious contractual dispute. The Tribunal applied the Mobilox test and held that the Adjudicating Authority must only ask whether the defence raises a contention needing further investigation; it cannot decide merits or require prior civil, arbitral or debit-note proceedings as a condition for dispute. Disputed credits, work-completion certificates and settlement documents were treated as matters for fuller adjudication, and the order admitting CIRP was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.