Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
A shareholder could not maintain a challenge to a concluded liquidation sale, and his separate status as personal guarantor had lost significance after a bankruptcy order. The objections to the e-auction also failed on merits: allegations of fraud and collusion were unsubstantiated, the auction notices were published in newspapers of wide circulation, and non-registration of the sale certificate was no bar because intimation to the Sub-Registrar was sufficient. Once the auction was confirmed, full consideration was paid, and the sale certificate issued, the liquidation sale stood closed and could not be reopened on unsupported objections.
A shareholder could not maintain a challenge to a concluded liquidation sale, and his separate status as personal guarantor had lost significance after a bankruptcy order. The objections to the e-auction also failed on merits: allegations of fraud and collusion were unsubstantiated, the auction notices were published in newspapers of wide circulation, and non-registration of the sale certificate was no bar because intimation to the Sub-Registrar was sufficient. Once the auction was confirmed, full consideration was paid, and the sale certificate issued, the liquidation sale stood closed and could not be reopened on unsupported objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.