Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Marketing and administrative support services rendered to an overseas entity were treated as export of services because the recipient was outside India, payment was received in convertible foreign exchange, and the arrangement was on a principal-to-principal basis; the place where work was performed in India was not determinative, so the service tax demand, interest and penalty were set aside. CENVAT credit denial for want of supporting documents also failed because the credit was disclosed in ST-3 returns and supporting invoices were produced during audit and refund proceedings, so the denial with interest and penalty was set aside. The extended period was unavailable in the absence of suppression, and the penalty for delayed registration survived only to the statutory ceiling.
Marketing and administrative support services rendered to an overseas entity were treated as export of services because the recipient was outside India, payment was received in convertible foreign exchange, and the arrangement was on a principal-to-principal basis; the place where work was performed in India was not determinative, so the service tax demand, interest and penalty were set aside. CENVAT credit denial for want of supporting documents also failed because the credit was disclosed in ST-3 returns and supporting invoices were produced during audit and refund proceedings, so the denial with interest and penalty was set aside. The extended period was unavailable in the absence of suppression, and the penalty for delayed registration survived only to the statutory ceiling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
