Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
