Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
