Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
An order rejecting a rebate claim and imposing penalty, based exclusively on a prior Single Judge decision, could not stand after that precedent was later set aside by a Division Bench. The High Court quashed the order because its sole foundation had disappeared, and remanded the rebate and penalty issues to the competent authority for fresh consideration in light of the Division Bench view, without expressing any opinion on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
