Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
GI welded wire mesh cleared for poultry farms was held classifiable under heading 7314, because tariff classification turns on the goods as manufactured and cleared, not their later use in poultry cages; a wire mesh does not become poultry keeping machinery or a part of it merely by intended use. The excise demand was therefore sustained only for the normal period, as the classification dispute involved competing entries and no deliberate suppression or misclassification was proved, so the extended period, section 11AC penalty, Rule 25 penalty and confiscation were set aside. The Tribunal also upheld service tax on erection, commissioning and installation activity at poultry farm sites. Personal penalty on the partner under Rule 26 failed because there was no evidence that he knew or had reason to believe the goods were liable to confiscation.
GI welded wire mesh cleared for poultry farms was held classifiable under heading 7314, because tariff classification turns on the goods as manufactured and cleared, not their later use in poultry cages; a wire mesh does not become poultry keeping machinery or a part of it merely by intended use. The excise demand was therefore sustained only for the normal period, as the classification dispute involved competing entries and no deliberate suppression or misclassification was proved, so the extended period, section 11AC penalty, Rule 25 penalty and confiscation were set aside. The Tribunal also upheld service tax on erection, commissioning and installation activity at poultry farm sites. Personal penalty on the partner under Rule 26 failed because there was no evidence that he knew or had reason to believe the goods were liable to confiscation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.