Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transitional input tax credit carried forward from the VAT regime could be utilised under GST, but not converted into a cash refund once it had been brought into the electronic credit ledger. The HC read the transitional provisions together and held that the second proviso to the refund-saving provision bars refund of credit already carried forward, while the refund provision applies only to unutilised GST input tax credit in the cases it specifically covers. It also noted that no prior hearing was given, but refused remand because the dispute turned on a pure question of law. The Court further stated that any rejected refund amount should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger under the prescribed procedure.
Transitional input tax credit carried forward from the VAT regime could be utilised under GST, but not converted into a cash refund once it had been brought into the electronic credit ledger. The HC read the transitional provisions together and held that the second proviso to the refund-saving provision bars refund of credit already carried forward, while the refund provision applies only to unutilised GST input tax credit in the cases it specifically covers. It also noted that no prior hearing was given, but refused remand because the dispute turned on a pure question of law. The Court further stated that any rejected refund amount should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger under the prescribed procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.