Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Transitional input tax credit carried forward from the VAT regime could be utilised under GST, but not converted into a cash refund once it had been brought into the electronic credit ledger. The HC read the transitional provisions together and held that the second proviso to the refund-saving provision bars refund of credit already carried forward, while the refund provision applies only to unutilised GST input tax credit in the cases it specifically covers. It also noted that no prior hearing was given, but refused remand because the dispute turned on a pure question of law. The Court further stated that any rejected refund amount should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger under the prescribed procedure.
Transitional input tax credit carried forward from the VAT regime could be utilised under GST, but not converted into a cash refund once it had been brought into the electronic credit ledger. The HC read the transitional provisions together and held that the second proviso to the refund-saving provision bars refund of credit already carried forward, while the refund provision applies only to unutilised GST input tax credit in the cases it specifically covers. It also noted that no prior hearing was given, but refused remand because the dispute turned on a pure question of law. The Court further stated that any rejected refund amount should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger under the prescribed procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.