Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ petition against an appealable GST order is maintainable only when the statutory appellate forum is not functional and the taxpayer would otherwise be left remediless. Once the GST Appellate Tribunal becomes functional and the appeal period is extended, the dispute should be pursued before that forum, and writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass statutory conditions such as pre-deposit and the notified filing timeline. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the statutory appeal before the GSTAT, and the merits of the impugned order were not examined.
A writ petition against an appealable GST order is maintainable only when the statutory appellate forum is not functional and the taxpayer would otherwise be left remediless. Once the GST Appellate Tribunal becomes functional and the appeal period is extended, the dispute should be pursued before that forum, and writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass statutory conditions such as pre-deposit and the notified filing timeline. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the statutory appeal before the GSTAT, and the merits of the impugned order were not examined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
