Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ petition against an appealable GST order is maintainable only when the statutory appellate forum is not functional and the taxpayer would otherwise be left remediless. Once the GST Appellate Tribunal becomes functional and the appeal period is extended, the dispute should be pursued before that forum, and writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass statutory conditions such as pre-deposit and the notified filing timeline. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the statutory appeal before the GSTAT, and the merits of the impugned order were not examined.
A writ petition against an appealable GST order is maintainable only when the statutory appellate forum is not functional and the taxpayer would otherwise be left remediless. Once the GST Appellate Tribunal becomes functional and the appeal period is extended, the dispute should be pursued before that forum, and writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass statutory conditions such as pre-deposit and the notified filing timeline. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the statutory appeal before the GSTAT, and the merits of the impugned order were not examined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
