Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
