Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
