Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
