Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) was treated as curative and operative from 01.07.2017, so input tax credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-3B returns were filed after the original due date if they were filed by 30.11.2021. The HC held that such returns regularised the credit claim for the relevant period and directed re-adjudication after verifying the filing dates. The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, and coercive steps were kept in abeyance until re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
