Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
