Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
