Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Scrutiny-based show cause notices for unreconciled input tax credit were treated as distinct from earlier audit-based proceedings, and the overlap with the prior section 73 action could not be resolved at the notice stage without a reply. The court held that, where the record suggests possible non-payment or short payment by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, a section 74 notice may be issued. The challenge was therefore not entertained at issuance, and the taxpayer was directed to respond before final adjudication.
Scrutiny-based show cause notices for unreconciled input tax credit were treated as distinct from earlier audit-based proceedings, and the overlap with the prior section 73 action could not be resolved at the notice stage without a reply. The court held that, where the record suggests possible non-payment or short payment by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, a section 74 notice may be issued. The challenge was therefore not entertained at issuance, and the taxpayer was directed to respond before final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
