Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 8D can be applied for exempt-income disallowance only after the Assessing Officer examines the assessee's accounts and records why the claim of lesser or no expenditure is incorrect under section 14A(2). The text says the officer rejected the claim merely for want of evidence, without identifying the missing material, analysing the cash-flow and fund-flow in the audited accounts, or linking borrowed funds, interest expenditure, or specific administrative to the exempt investments. The appellate authority also did not address this statutory defect. The further disallowance under Rule 8D was therefore treated as unsustainable and was confined to the assessee's voluntary disallowance.
Rule 8D can be applied for exempt-income disallowance only after the Assessing Officer examines the assessee's accounts and records why the claim of lesser or no expenditure is incorrect under section 14A(2). The text says the officer rejected the claim merely for want of evidence, without identifying the missing material, analysing the cash-flow and fund-flow in the audited accounts, or linking borrowed funds, interest expenditure, or specific administrative to the exempt investments. The appellate authority also did not address this statutory defect. The further disallowance under Rule 8D was therefore treated as unsustainable and was confined to the assessee's voluntary disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
