Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs duty cannot be fastened jointly and severally on multiple noticees without first determining the actual importer and the role of each person. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must examine the documentary evidence, record clear factual findings on individual responsibility, and then fix duty and penalty, if warranted, on the person concerned. Because the impugned order had imposed liability without that determination, it was set aside against the appellants and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by a speaking order, with all contentions left open.
Customs duty cannot be fastened jointly and severally on multiple noticees without first determining the actual importer and the role of each person. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must examine the documentary evidence, record clear factual findings on individual responsibility, and then fix duty and penalty, if warranted, on the person concerned. Because the impugned order had imposed liability without that determination, it was set aside against the appellants and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by a speaking order, with all contentions left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.