Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Customs duty cannot be fastened jointly and severally on multiple noticees without first determining the actual importer and the role of each person. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must examine the documentary evidence, record clear factual findings on individual responsibility, and then fix duty and penalty, if warranted, on the person concerned. Because the impugned order had imposed liability without that determination, it was set aside against the appellants and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by a speaking order, with all contentions left open.
Customs duty cannot be fastened jointly and severally on multiple noticees without first determining the actual importer and the role of each person. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must examine the documentary evidence, record clear factual findings on individual responsibility, and then fix duty and penalty, if warranted, on the person concerned. Because the impugned order had imposed liability without that determination, it was set aside against the appellants and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by a speaking order, with all contentions left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.