Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Integrated Wi Fi and Bluetooth functionality determined the classification of both goods: the development board and the module were found to be embedded electronic assemblies whose principal function was wireless data transmission and reception, not automatic data processing or ADP parts. The board was held not to answer the description of an ADP machine, and the module was held not to be a part used solely or principally with ADP machines. Heading 8542 was also rejected because both goods were assembled modules on printed circuit boards, not bare integrated circuits. Both were classified under CTI 8517 62 90. The request to keep the ruling confidential for commercially sensitive information was allowed.
Integrated Wi Fi and Bluetooth functionality determined the classification of both goods: the development board and the module were found to be embedded electronic assemblies whose principal function was wireless data transmission and reception, not automatic data processing or ADP parts. The board was held not to answer the description of an ADP machine, and the module was held not to be a part used solely or principally with ADP machines. Heading 8542 was also rejected because both goods were assembled modules on printed circuit boards, not bare integrated circuits. Both were classified under CTI 8517 62 90. The request to keep the ruling confidential for commercially sensitive information was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.